<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Horn of Plenty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2009/10/16/the-horn-of-plenty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2009/10/16/the-horn-of-plenty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Salomon</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2009/10/16/the-horn-of-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Salomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=1291#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the head&#039;s up Sherry. 

Personally, I think Gap is making a huge mistake by entering China. And they are compounding it by committing to full ownership of the assets on the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the head&#8217;s up Sherry. </p>
<p>Personally, I think Gap is making a huge mistake by entering China. And they are compounding it by committing to full ownership of the assets on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2009/10/16/the-horn-of-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=1291#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Prof Salomon, for the interesting post. Your post reminded me of another article I read on WSJ (as linked) regarding Gap Inc. to open its first store in China. 

What interested me is that Gap this time will adopt a somewhat bold operational strategy. 

The article says, &quot;Gap operates more than 300 stores outside of the U.S. It also has roughly 130 stores in 17 countries that are operated under franchise agreements, in which Gap provides the product and controls the look of the store but outsources local operations to a firm familiar with the country.  Gap will own the China store. It will use Chinese-based companies to provide some services, such as distribution, but will manage the store itself. &quot;

It will certainly add a bit more cost to this initiative; however, this strategy might help Gap&#039;s intent to  &quot;redesign its stores, for the first time in the brand&#039;s 15-year history&quot;. The article does not say which line, bargain vs. high-end, Gap will introduce to China. It is certainly wise to follow and see how their endeavor will pay off in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Prof Salomon, for the interesting post. Your post reminded me of another article I read on WSJ (as linked) regarding Gap Inc. to open its first store in China. </p>
<p>What interested me is that Gap this time will adopt a somewhat bold operational strategy. </p>
<p>The article says, &#8220;Gap operates more than 300 stores outside of the U.S. It also has roughly 130 stores in 17 countries that are operated under franchise agreements, in which Gap provides the product and controls the look of the store but outsources local operations to a firm familiar with the country.  Gap will own the China store. It will use Chinese-based companies to provide some services, such as distribution, but will manage the store itself. &#8221;</p>
<p>It will certainly add a bit more cost to this initiative; however, this strategy might help Gap&#8217;s intent to  &#8220;redesign its stores, for the first time in the brand&#8217;s 15-year history&#8221;. The article does not say which line, bargain vs. high-end, Gap will introduce to China. It is certainly wise to follow and see how their endeavor will pay off in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prakash</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2009/10/16/the-horn-of-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Prakash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=1291#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>Great post Prof Salomon. The articles on China clearly exemplify how and why doing business in China is still an arduous task for most MNCs. And the links on Schumpeter and Wall Street collapse made for a very interesting read. Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Prof Salomon. The articles on China clearly exemplify how and why doing business in China is still an arduous task for most MNCs. And the links on Schumpeter and Wall Street collapse made for a very interesting read. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

