<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why a Pre-Packaged Bankruptcy for GM is Unlikely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/11/25/why-a-pre-packaged-bankruptcy-for-gm-is-unlikely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/11/25/why-a-pre-packaged-bankruptcy-for-gm-is-unlikely/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: w.m. martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/11/25/why-a-pre-packaged-bankruptcy-for-gm-is-unlikely/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>w.m. martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=138#comment-940</guid>
		<description>I work for G.M. , the blame for there problems is shared by the UAW and Management almost equally.  You have some radical Local union Chairmen that are a problem. The UAW gave a number of consessions during the last contract 2007,  $14 per hour wage, G.M now has NO responsibilty for retirement or medical coverage other than small lump sum payments yearly. The average wage was $19 an hour for manufacturing labor in 2007 . Nobody wants to talk about the physical problems that are inherent working the assembly line, 60% of the people I work with have had physical problems needing surgery. The union also gave up &quot;Sub pay and Jobs bank&quot;, there is not much left in that dead horse.
But when G.M. hires shop floor Advisers [Management] that are not trained or qualified to do there jobs this becomes a problem with the basic build of the product.  These people are paid $70,000 to $80,000 to take attendance.  These people are under educated, inexperinced and usually family or friends of upper management, this hiring process must stop.  They are a negative asset when it comes to the basic build of the product.  This is 40 to 50% of lower management. I know that the idea of replacing top management is 1000% correct, but take a closer look on down the hill. As a taxpayer, inside GM looking out i know bailout is a waste of money , unless changes are made in management. I have worked in 3 different assembly plants over the years and only the name on the front of the building was different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for G.M. , the blame for there problems is shared by the UAW and Management almost equally.  You have some radical Local union Chairmen that are a problem. The UAW gave a number of consessions during the last contract 2007,  $14 per hour wage, G.M now has NO responsibilty for retirement or medical coverage other than small lump sum payments yearly. The average wage was $19 an hour for manufacturing labor in 2007 . Nobody wants to talk about the physical problems that are inherent working the assembly line, 60% of the people I work with have had physical problems needing surgery. The union also gave up &#8220;Sub pay and Jobs bank&#8221;, there is not much left in that dead horse.<br />
But when G.M. hires shop floor Advisers [Management] that are not trained or qualified to do there jobs this becomes a problem with the basic build of the product.  These people are paid $70,000 to $80,000 to take attendance.  These people are under educated, inexperinced and usually family or friends of upper management, this hiring process must stop.  They are a negative asset when it comes to the basic build of the product.  This is 40 to 50% of lower management. I know that the idea of replacing top management is 1000% correct, but take a closer look on down the hill. As a taxpayer, inside GM looking out i know bailout is a waste of money , unless changes are made in management. I have worked in 3 different assembly plants over the years and only the name on the front of the building was different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
