<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Déjà vu Vu All Over Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/06/04/deja-vu-vu-all-over-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/06/04/deja-vu-vu-all-over-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Salomon</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/06/04/deja-vu-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Salomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=88#comment-329</guid>
		<description>If issuers continue to pay, then it could be fear on the part of the investors - they may fear that issuers will stop paying at some point in the future. Or it could be liquidity - would be investors are liquidity constrained in their own operations and don&#039;t have as much cash to invest.

If it&#039;s the former, and you assume that issuers will continue to pay as they have (maybe you have some better information that the rest of the market), there might be some opportunity to arb the product - to purchase ARS at attractive risk-adjusted rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If issuers continue to pay, then it could be fear on the part of the investors &#8211; they may fear that issuers will stop paying at some point in the future. Or it could be liquidity &#8211; would be investors are liquidity constrained in their own operations and don&#8217;t have as much cash to invest.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s the former, and you assume that issuers will continue to pay as they have (maybe you have some better information that the rest of the market), there might be some opportunity to arb the product &#8211; to purchase ARS at attractive risk-adjusted rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/06/04/deja-vu-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=88#comment-328</guid>
		<description>If issuers are continuing to pay the higher interest rates to the holders,  are there any other reasons why ARS are not trading or getting more interest from investors/corporations?  Is solvency the main reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If issuers are continuing to pay the higher interest rates to the holders,  are there any other reasons why ARS are not trading or getting more interest from investors/corporations?  Is solvency the main reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Salomon</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/06/04/deja-vu-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Salomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=88#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Good question Matt. As I wrote in an earlier post:

The question then becomes - How do you determine which auctions failed because the market is tough right now and buyers are scared and therefore scarce, versus, those that failed because the underlying asset to which the securities are tied really do not have value so buyers are rightly not interested?

So it becomes a question of solvency. As a potential buyer of these assets, if I believe that the underlying issuer is a insolvent, I am likely not willing to buy it, whatever the rate.

If I&#039;m a corporate holder of ARS, I could switch them from my short-term holdings to my long-term holdings (as many companies have done), but then again, at the higher reset rates, many of the issuers are unable to pay, and the corporations holding them experience diminished cash flows as a result of default on the part of the issuer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Matt. As I wrote in an earlier post:</p>
<p>The question then becomes &#8211; How do you determine which auctions failed because the market is tough right now and buyers are scared and therefore scarce, versus, those that failed because the underlying asset to which the securities are tied really do not have value so buyers are rightly not interested?</p>
<p>So it becomes a question of solvency. As a potential buyer of these assets, if I believe that the underlying issuer is a insolvent, I am likely not willing to buy it, whatever the rate.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m a corporate holder of ARS, I could switch them from my short-term holdings to my long-term holdings (as many companies have done), but then again, at the higher reset rates, many of the issuers are unable to pay, and the corporations holding them experience diminished cash flows as a result of default on the part of the issuer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blog.robertsalomon.com/2008/06/04/deja-vu-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertsalomon.com/?p=88#comment-326</guid>
		<description>These ARS are confusing.  What I don&#039;t understand is why investors/corporations are not buying these.  From what I understand,  if auctions failed, the issuer had to pay the investor a higher yield, which some of these corporations/investors are receiving.  Why aren&#039;t some companies/investors buying these instruments as long term bonds?  Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ARS are confusing.  What I don&#8217;t understand is why investors/corporations are not buying these.  From what I understand,  if auctions failed, the issuer had to pay the investor a higher yield, which some of these corporations/investors are receiving.  Why aren&#8217;t some companies/investors buying these instruments as long term bonds?  Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
